Of Terrorists and their proponents
Print & pdfBy Huzaima Bukhari and Dr. Ikramul Haq
The likely threat of military attack by the US and its allies in the tribal areas of Pakistan using the pretext of potential strike like 9/11 and increasing activities of the Taliban is creating fear and panic amongst masses. The main agenda behind this bizarre scheme is to push the armed forces of Pakistan to the wall, get the control of nuclear arsenals and use bogey of ‘Islamic terrorism’ for the containment of China. George W. Bush Jr., now lame-duck President, before leaving the Oval, wants to ensure that the new man taking his place should have no option but to remain engaged in wars in various parts of the world.
Before one tries to understand the recent US military and propaganda outbursts against the Taliban, one must turn one’s mental clock back three decades or so, and recollect the legacy of Bush Senior. It was George Herbert Walker Bush’s ‘New World Order’ that led to the biggest and worldwide economic chaos during the Gulf War. As Vice-President and President, Bush was an unfortunate instance of ‘collateral damage’, or a ‘necessary evil’, flowing from his more primary geopolitical mission: to usher in the post-nation-state “one world order”, first spelled out in the mid-1970s Trilateral Commission studies of Samuel Huntington and Zbigniew Brzezinski, and first unleashed by the 1977-81 ‘All Trilat’ Jimmy Carter administration.
George Bush remarkable feats include inter alia amongst others:
Comments
TS Picks
Print & pdf1. U.S. Perpetuates Mass Killings In Iraq : Peter Phillips, Dissident Voice
2. America’s Most Dangerous Criminal : By Allen L. Roland, from his weblog
3. American Banks Fear Failure : The Economist
4. US Faces Global Funding Crisis : U.K. Telegraph
5. Public Debt Limit Enters Housing Debate : Wall Street Journal
Comments
Taliban breached NATO base in deadly clash
Print & pdfBy Carlotta Gall and Eric Schmitt - International Herald Tribune
July 15, 2008-The Taliban insurgents who attacked a remote American-run outpost near the Pakistan border on Sunday numbered nearly 200 fighters, almost three times the size of the allied force, and some breached the NATO compound in a coordinated assault that took the defenders by surprise, Western officials said Monday.
The attackers were driven back in a pitched four-hour battle, and appeared to suffer scores of dead and wounded of their own, but the toll they inflicted was sobering. The base and a nearby observation post were manned by just 45 American troops and 25 Afghan soldiers, two senior allied officials said, asking for anonymity while an investigation is under way.
With 9 Americans dead and at least 15 injured, that means that one in five of the American defenders was killed and nearly half the remainder were wounded. Four Afghan soldiers were also injured.
American and Afghan forces started building the makeshift base just last week and its defenses were not fully in place, said one senior allied official. In some places, troops were using their vehicles as barriers against insurgents.
Comments
It’s the Oil, stupid!
Print & pdfBy Noam Chomsky
Anwaar’s Note: If wishes were horses, I would be Chomsky. More people would listen to me than they are doing now. After this, please do read my Hydro Carbon Law for Dummies written way back in March 2007.
The deal just taking shape between Iraq’s Oil Ministry and four Western oil companies raises critical questions about the nature of the US invasion and occupation of Iraq - questions that should certainly be addressed by presidential candidates and seriously discussed in the United States, and of course in occupied Iraq, where it appears that the population has little if any role in determining the future of their country.
Negotiations are under way for Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total and BP - the original partners decades ago in the Iraq Petroleum Company, now joined by Chevron and other smaller oil companies - to renew the oil concession they lost to nationalisation during the years when the oil producers took over their own resources. The no-bid contracts, apparently written by the oil corporations with the help of U.S. officials, prevailed over offers from more than 40 other companies, including companies in China, India and Russia.
“There was suspicion among many in the Arab world and among parts of the American public that the United States had gone to war in Iraq precisely to secure the oil wealth these contracts seek to extract,” Andrew E. Kramer wrote in The New York Times.
Comments
TS Picks
Print & pdf1. The Truth Commission : By Nicholas D. Kristof : The NYT
2. War on Iran: The Perfect Storm From Hell : By Timothy Alexander, Rense.com
3. Anxious in America : By Thomas L. Friedman : The NYT
4. America, its Time for some Serious Wakeup Calls : By D.L. Dewey, Dewey’s World
5. Why Gentile Americans Back the Jewish State : By Walter Russell Mead, Martinfrost.ws
Comments
TS Picks
Print & pdf1. Preparing the Battlefield : By Seymour Hersh, The New Yorker
2. Coded prejudice is cloaked dagger : By Dahleen Glanton, Chicago Tribune
3. Gloom and Doom? Nah; Just for the U.S. : Interview with Peter D. Schiff, Barron’s
4. China Inspired Interrogations at Guantánamo : By Scott Shane, The NYT
5. Amid policy disputes, Qaeda grows in Pakistan : By Mark Mazzetti and David Rohde - The IHT
Comments
TS Picks
Print & pdf1. Energy crisis: Turning-point of humanity : By Rudo de Ruijter, Independent Researcher
2. Your Brain Lies to You : By Sam Wang and Sandra Aamodt, The NYT
3. Karzai is telling half-truth : By Jehangir Khattak, The Dawn
4. The grim dangers in FATA : By Rahimullah Yusufzai, The News
5. What Obama should say on Iraq : By Fareed Zakaria, Khaleej Times
6. Islamabad blinks at Taliban threat : By Saleem Shahzad, Asia Times
7. Four paths to Israeli security : By Mohammad Akef Jamal, Gulf News
Comments
TS Picks
Print & pdf1. The Bilderberg “Blackout” : By Jack Shafer, The Slate
2. Interrogation for Profit : NYT Editorial
3. Blackwater’s Private Spies : by Jeremy Scahill, The Nation
4. More Phony Myths : By Maureen Dowd, The NYT
5. America’s Next Chapter : By Gary Hart, NYT Op-Ed
Comments
The Truth Will Emerge
Print & pdfby US Senator Robert Byrd, Senate Floor Remarks - May 21, 2003
Published on Wednesday, May 21, 2003 by CommonDreams.org

“Truth, crushed to earth, shall rise again, - -
The eternal years of God are hers;
But Error, wounded, writhes in pain,
And dies among his worshippers.”
Truth has a way of asserting itself despite all attempts to obscure it. Distortion only serves to derail it for a time. No matter to what lengths we humans may go to obfuscate facts or delude our fellows, truth has a way of squeezing out through the cracks, eventually.
But the danger is that at some point it may no longer matter. The danger is that damage is done before the truth is widely realized. The reality is that, sometimes, it is easier to ignore uncomfortable facts and go along with whatever distortion is currently in vogue. We see a lot of this today in politics. I see a lot of it — more than I would ever have believed — right on this Senate Floor.
Regarding the situation in Iraq, it appears to this Senator that the American people may have been lured into accepting the unprovoked invasion of a sovereign nation, in violation of long-standing International law, under false premises. There is ample evidence that the horrific events of September 11 have been carefully manipulated to switch public focus from Osama Bin Laden and Al Queda who masterminded the September 11th attacks, to Saddam Hussein who did not. The run up to our invasion of Iraq featured the President and members of his cabinet invoking every frightening image they could conjure, from mushroom clouds, to buried caches of germ warfare, to drones poised to deliver germ laden death in our major cities. We were treated to a heavy dose of overstatement concerning Saddam Hussein’s direct threat to our freedoms. The tactic was guaranteed to provoke a sure reaction from a nation still suffering from a combination of post traumatic stress and justifiable anger after the attacks of 911. It was the exploitation of fear. It was a placebo for the anger.
Comments
And the winner is … the Israel lobby
Print & pdfBy Pepe Escobar
They’re all here - and they’re all ready to party. The three United States presidential candidates - John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Madam House speaker Nancy Pelosi. Most US senators and virtually half of the US Congress. Vice President Dick Cheney’s wife, Lynne. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Embattled Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. And a host of Jewish and non-Jewish political and academic heavy-hitters among the 7,000 participants.
Such star power wattage, a Washington version of the Oscars, is the stock in trade of AIPAC - the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the crucial player in what is generally known as the Israel lobby and which holds its annual Policy Conference this week in Washington at which most of the heavyweights will deliver lectures.
Few books in recent years have been as explosive or controversial as The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, written by Stephen Walt from Harvard University and John Mearsheimer from the University of Chicago, published in 2007. In it, professors Walt and Mearsheimer argued the case of the Israeli lobby not as “a cabal or conspiracy that ‘controls’ US foreign policy”, but as an extremely powerful interest group made up of Jews and non-Jews, a “loose coalition of individuals and organizations tirelessly working to move US foreign policy in Israel’s direction”.






In the United Vegetative State of America, Anwaar Hussain, a Masters in Defense and Strategic Studies, delivers a comprehensive and unsettling analysis of the dissolution of liberty in America and how an administration of neo-conservatives is using the threat of lost freedoms and increased terrorism as a justification for international aggression and violence.
